Zen of Stalin or Stalin of Russian psychotherapyVladimir MakhinyaZen of Stalin or Stalin of Russian psychotherapy. I thank the Ural readers for criticizing my first article in this series about the work of the psyche. Perhaps they are right that my sentences of more than 20 words, although interesting to read, are difficult. Therefore, I now write in a more clip-like manner, in accordance with the wishes of the readers. I cannot deny myself the spontaneity and impromptu writing. The difference between truth and lies is of key and fundamental importance in understanding the psyche. Why is the odious and ambiguous figure of Stalin? Stalin was a very powerful magician, or in scientific terms, had a developed psyche that allowed him to distinguish not just truth from lies, but actual life from lies. It turns out that all the odiousness and ambiguity of Stalin is due to the conflict of historical truth in the Zeitgeist (Zeitgeist - according to Boring ), with British Russophobic propaganda. To be convinced of this, just watch the wonderful British film “Archangel” with the famous Daniel Craig in the role of an American professor who, together with a Russian prostitute, saves the world from the illegitimate son of the terrible Stalin in no less terrible Russia. Thus, the reliability of information about Stalin and the history of Russia - there will be much more anecdotes or stories about the jokes of Stalin himself than from British cinema and other equally fantastic spin-masters. So I present here these stories about Stalin’s jokes, which will tell you about him and his circle and will help better understand how the psyche works and why psychotherapy does not work. 1. When developing the Pobeda car, it was planned that the name of the car would be “Motherland”. Having learned about this, Stalin ironically asked: “Well, how much will we have a Motherland?” The name of the car was immediately changed.2. From the memoirs of one of Stalin’s guards, A. Rybin. On his trips, Stalin was often accompanied by his bodyguard Tukov. He sat in the front seat next to the driver and had a habit of falling asleep on the way. One of the members of the Politburo, riding with Stalin in the back seat, remarked: “Comrade Stalin, I don’t understand which of you is guarding whom?” “What is that,” answered Joseph Vissarionovich, “he also put his pistol in my raincoat - take it.” , they say, just in case! 3. One day Stalin was informed that Marshal Rokossovsky had a mistress and this was the famous beautiful actress Valentina Serova. And, they say, what are we going to do with them now? Stalin took the pipe out of his mouth, thought a little and said: “What will we, what will we... we will envy!”4. Stalin walked with the First Secretary of the Central Committee of Georgia A.I. Mgeladze along the alleys of the Kuntsevo dacha and treated him to lemons, which he grew himself in his lemon garden: “Try it, they grew here, near Moscow!” And so several times, between conversations on other topics: “Try, good lemons!” Finally, it dawned on the interlocutor: “Comrade Stalin, I promise you that in seven years Georgia will provide the country with lemons, and we will not import them from abroad.” “Thank God, I guessed!” - said Stalin.5. The designer of artillery systems V. G. Grabin told me how on the eve of 1942 Stalin invited him and said: “Your gun saved Russia.” What do you want - a Hero of Socialist Labor or a Stalin Prize? - I don’t care, Comrade Stalin. They gave both.6. During the war, troops under the command of Bagramyan were the first to reach the Baltic. To make this event more pathetic, the Armenian general personally poured water from the Baltic Sea into a bottle and ordered his adjutant to fly with this bottle to Moscow to see Stalin. He flew away. But while he was flying, the Germans counterattacked and drove Bagramyan off the Baltic coast. By the time the adjutant arrived in Moscow, they were already aware of this, but the adjutant himself did not know - there was no radio on the plane. And so the proud adjutant enters Stalin’s office and pathetically proclaims: “Comrade Stalin, General Bagramyan is sending you Baltic water!” Stalin takes the bottle, twirls it in his hands for a few seconds, then gives it back to the adjutant and says: “Give it back.”Tell Bagramyan to pour it out where he took it. G7. Various people who happened to watch films with Stalin told me many episodes on this topic. Here is one of them. In 1939 we watched “The Train Goes East.” The film is not so hot: a train travels, stops... - What station is this? – Stalin asked. “Demyanovka.” “This is where I’ll get off,” Stalin said and left the hall.8. A candidacy for the post of Minister of the Coal Industry was discussed. The director of one of the mines, Zasyadko, was proposed. Someone objected: “Everything is fine, but he abuses alcohol!” “Invite him to me,” said Stalin. Zasyadko came. Stalin began talking to him and offered him a drink. “With pleasure,” said Zasyadko, poured a glass of vodka: “To your health, Comrade Stalin!” – he drank and continued the conversation. Stalin took a sip and, watching carefully, offered a second one. Zasyadko - drink a second glass, and not in either eye. Stalin suggested a third, but his interlocutor pushed his glass aside and said: “Zasyadko knows when to stop.” We talked. At a meeting of the Politburo, when the question of the candidacy of the minister again arose, and again it was announced that the proposed candidate was abusing alcohol, Stalin, walking with a pipe, said: “Zasyadko knows when to stop!” And for many years Zasyadko headed our coal industry...9. One colonel general reported to Stalin about the state of affairs. The Supreme Commander looked very pleased and nodded twice in approval. Having finished his report, the military leader hesitated. Stalin asked: “Do you want to say anything else?” “Yes, I have a personal question. In Germany, I selected some things that interested me, but they were detained at the checkpoint. If possible, I would ask you to return them to me." "It is possible. Write a report, I will impose a resolution.” The Colonel General pulled out a prepared report from his pocket. Stalin imposed the resolution. The petitioner began to thank him warmly. “There is no need for gratitude,” Stalin remarked. After reading the resolution written on the report: “Return his junk to the colonel. I. Stalin,” the general turned to the Supreme Commander: “There is a typo here, Comrade Stalin. I am not a colonel, but a colonel general.” “No, everything is correct here, Comrade Colonel,” Stalin answered.10. Admiral I. Isakov has been Deputy People's Commissar of the Navy since 1938. One day in 1946, Stalin called him and said that there was an opinion to appoint him head of the Main Naval Staff, which that year was renamed the Main Headquarters of the Navy. Isakov replied: “Comrade Stalin, I must report to you that I have a serious disadvantage: one leg is amputated.” .“Is this the only deficiency that you consider necessary to report?” - followed the question. “Yes,” confirmed the admiral. “We used to have a chief of staff without a head.” Nothing, it worked. You just don’t have a leg - it’s not scary,” concluded Stalin.11. After the war, Stalin learned that Professor K. had “built up” an expensive dacha near Moscow. He called him to him and asked: “Is it true that you built yourself a dacha for so many thousands?!” “True, Comrade Stalin,” answered the professor. “Thank you very much from the orphanage, to which you gave this dacha,” said Stalin and sent him to teach in Novosibirsk.12. In the fall of 1936, a rumor spread in the West that Joseph Stalin had died from a serious illness. Charles Nitter, a correspondent for the Associated Press news agency, decided to get information from the most reliable source. He went to the Kremlin, where he gave Stalin a letter in which he asked: to confirm or refute this rumor. Stalin answered the journalist immediately: “Dear sir! As far as I know from reports in the foreign press, I have long since left this sinful world and moved to the next world. Since the reports of the foreign press cannot be ignored, if you do not want to be erased from the list of civilized people, then I ask you to believe these reports and not disturb my peace in the silence of the other world. October 26, 1936. Sincerely, J. Stalin."13 . Once foreign correspondents asked Stalin: “Why on the coat of arms of ArmeniaMount Ararat is depicted, because it is not located on the territory of Armenia? Stalin replied: “The coat of arms of Turkey depicts a crescent, but it is also not located on the territory of Turkey.14. The People's Commissar of Agriculture of Ukraine was summoned to the Politburo. He asked: “How should I report: briefly or in detail?” “As you want, you can briefly, you can detail, but the rule is three minutes,” Stalin answered.15. A new production of Glinka’s opera “Ivan Susanin” was being prepared at the Bolshoi Theater. The members of the commission, led by Chairman Bolshakov, listened and decided that it was necessary to remove the finale “Hail, Russian people!”: churchism, patriarchalism... They reported to Stalin: “And we will do it differently: we will leave the ending, but we will remove Bolshakov.”16. When they were deciding what to do with the German navy, Stalin proposed dividing it up, and Churchill made a counter-proposal: “Sink.” Stalin replies: “Here you are drowning your half.”17. Stalin came to the performance at Hood. theater. Stanislavsky met him and, holding out his hand, said: “Alekseev,” calling his real name. “Dzhugashvili,” answered Stalin, shaking his hand, and walked to his chair.18. Harriman at the Potsdam Conference asked Stalin: “After the Germans were 18 km away in 1941. from Moscow, you probably now enjoy sharing defeated Berlin?” “Tsar Alexander reached Paris,” answered Stalin.19. Stalin asked the meteorologists what percentage of forecast accuracy they had. “Forty percent, Comrade Stalin.” “But you say the opposite, and then you will have sixty percent.”20. During the war, Stalin entrusted Baibakov with the discovery of new oil fields. When Baibakov objected that this was impossible, Stalin replied: “There will be oil, there will be Baibakov, there will be no oil, there will be no Baibakov!” Deposits were soon discovered in Tataria and Bashkiria. These stories are very indicative and speak for themselves. It is obvious how Stalin, by the force of his authority, affirms the factual truth of life, denying the lies that control his opponents and guide them. In this case, the authority of dictator Stalin competes with the dictates of lies that dominate his opponents and have nothing to do with the truth of life, as in story number 20, where Baibakov extremely falsely asserted the impossibility of oil production in Tatarstan and Bashkiria. Everyone knows that there is a sea oil specifically in Tatarstan and Bashkiria. So what’s the matter? Why didn’t Stalin shoot Baibakov, who was lying to his face, as an enemy of the people? The fact of the matter is that if Stalin really was not a magician, or, more simply put, not a talented manager who was fluent in the psychology of management, then he would have given the order to shoot the liar. And in this way, you can shoot a lot of people, almost the entire population. But this did not happen. Here, for example, is how the newest Minister of Education of Russia, a well-educated scientist, Professor Olga Vasilyeva, speaks about Joseph Vissarionovich: The original source - the Kommersant report - does not quote Vasilyeva, but retells the review of one of the forum listeners: “According to one of the listeners, in this In her lectures, she (Professor Olga Vasilyeva) made it clear that Stalin, despite all his shortcomings, was a public good, because on the eve of the war he took up the unity of the nation, revived the heroes of pre-revolutionary Russia and began promoting the Russian language and literature, which, by and large, made it possible to win the war.” It is the Great Victory over fascism that is the main historical and factual truth about Stalin’s management, and everything else: speculation and fantasy, motivated by political and propaganda goals. A huge number of people make PR and advertising for themselves by discussing the horrors of Stalinism. This is how the talented Russian director Vladimir Potapov speaks about it, after filming in China his Chinese(!) film about the feat of the Russian(!) girl “Frozen Angel”: “Comparing our cinema and Chinese, I came to the conclusion that Chinese filmmakers are much closer to the people in a good and not a bad sense, so to speak. They film about goodness. There is practically no such thing asopportunistic auteur cinema, in which everything that was very recently good suddenly became very bad. They simply do not understand those who vilify the previous government and thereby their country, without offering anything, but simply playing with people in their “bold” desire to see something hot and do not give them money for production. I remember the film "Republic of SHKID." There was one such teacher who flirted with the bullies. This idea was clearly repeated by Alla Surikova in the comedy “The Man from the Boulevard des Capucines”, when another projectionist arrived and put everyone out in one show. It is much easier to make and show films about the “shortcomings of the past” than to instill in people hope, faith and love for the future. And the desire, as well as the ability to publicly betray on the screen all those who raised you, was always welcomed everywhere for some reason, with the advent of each new government. They get noticed. They become classics. I never understood why. There is no courage in kicking a dead lion. And exploitation, and especially the cultivation of base human passions, does not, in my opinion, honor any of them. And somehow he does it for some reason. I don't understand. Well, it wasn’t all that bad, why are you lying? And then sometimes it’s scary to imagine what filmmakers will shoot in fifty years. How they will show those who will have left by that time.” And there can be a huge difference between words and deeds, and creative people, adults and people with a developed psyche can notice this. For example, the observation of the famous Russian director Vladimir Potapov (“07 changes course”, “A Secret for Two”) about cinema and life, he, like Joseph Stalin, notices and does not condemn in people, maybe even very good people, the difference in what these good people declare and in what they actually do in life. Vladimir Potapov says that people are wonderful and wonderful and say everything is wonderful and wonderful, but what they do in modern cinema is extremely different from their own wonderful declarations and far from for the better. That is, it is actually present a certain phenomenon of lies, distortion of Reality and the Future in a person’s thoughts in such a way that both Reality and the Future are extremely different from what actually exists in life. And at the moment I would like to designate not the Picture of the World and not the Model of the World, which in the form of a simple interpretations, denotes concepts from cognitive psychology in a simple Russian proverb that everyone looks from their own bell tower. That's not even the point. What I want to talk about is closer to some concepts of the famous psychologist Nikolai Kozlov, who is in demand by the country’s top management and practices his synthonic approach based on the ideas of the now banned sect of Scientology. (Or do Scientologists still thrive on Taganka?) This is how he describes the Inner The saboteur is famous psychologist Nikolai Kozlov: “In addition, a woman wants to be feminine, and since the everyday idea of ​​femininity includes female weakness, as a result a woman turns out to be weak even when she wants to control herself. And once upon a time she says to herself “I must,” but suddenly she is faced with the fact that already at her own “I must” she begins to feel weak and protest. This is also the Inner Saboteur. Our character is a consequence of our habits, and our habitual emotions are simply our habits. We do it all ourselves. If a girl in childhood taught herself to spoil her health and mood, when she was treated unkindly and strictly told “must”, she developed a protest against any orders in her character. Similarly, if a girl in childhood always made herself “inner sunshine” and “good” in response to kind treatment towards her, this will also become her character trait: responsiveness to a kind word. But pay attention: in all these cases we spoil our mood, and we lift our spirits - we ourselves. From the point of view of the synton approach, the game “inner saboteur” is born in childhood, like many other manipulative games. In the process of such games, children learn protests and grievances, fatigue and tears. Three typicalgames - Durik, Victim and Brawler. And how to work with ourselves when our Inner Saboteur turns on within us? If you love psychotherapy, work with your subpersonalities, get to know your Inner Saboteur. Draw him, talk to him, understand his benefits, negotiate with him... And if you are a man of action and you are not interested in such psychotherapy, then everything is even simpler: become attentive and, without succumbing to internal resistance, start doing what need to. You are stronger than this bad habit. If it’s difficult, think about how to help yourself - maybe remove distracting interference (TV), maybe find yourself more often in a work environment where it’s customary to work, rather than sigh sadly. One way or another, the old habit goes away when a new habit is formed in its place. And your new habit: “No sooner said than done!” “You can, of course, find fault with Kozlov, accuse him of psychocults, as many do, but my task is to convey to the reader in the most intelligible and clip-like way about the structure of the psyche and how Why psychotherapy doesn't work. And I quote Kozlov so much precisely because of his popularity and relevance. Consequently, he is well understood. And on the basis of this understanding, I would like to somehow get closer to understanding the dominant of Alexei Ukhtomsky. Therefore, it would be more correct to replace all these Kozlov internal saboteurs, fools, victims and rowdies with something more consistent with reality, but no less understandable. And perhaps I’ll introduce a simple concept for this: “zip.” Because everyone knows that everyone has their own cockroaches in their heads. But in my opinion, “zipper” is cuter than cockroaches, and a very famous character from a popular cartoon, and everyone knows him. And I would say that everyone has their own “zipper” in their head. And here, drawing a parallel with the popular Nikolai Kozlov (probably many still regret that the ideological foundations of Kozlov’s psychology are recognized as a psycho-cult, and Scientology itself is a sect) and his understanding for the people With the concept of “internal saboteur”, I will decipher the direct competitor of both cockroaches and the “internal saboteur” in the form of the venerable “zipper”. So “zip”: this is the Internal Rogue Infernal Puppeteer (IZHIK). Let’s look at it in more detail. Why “internal” - for the same reason as Kozlovsky. A “saboteur,” that is, is located inside the psyche and is not visible, but one can understand that he exists only from human activity. (remember director Potapov, above in the text he is perplexed as to why they say one thing and do another). Why he is a “crook” will become very clear to everyone if everyone compares the results of their activities in life with what they want and dream, and even plan! A person says that he wants this and that. Does. What happens? Sound familiar? But there are also successful people! But who is not deceived in at least something? And he is deceived by himself - by his own ideas about the future! Remember Stalin’s jokes above in the text and about the famous Tatar oil, which “cannot exist.” Why "infernal"? It’s simple, again, remembering Kozlov’s advice, to work with subpersonalities. What are subpersonalities according to Assagioli, in the structure of the psyche, by the way, there is God? Subpersonalities according to Assagioli, are these former incarnations of the human soul? Or remembering “Psychotherapy in special states of consciousness” by Akhmedov and his words about “frozen inhabitants of the subconscious, which only by transferring into consciousness can be deprived of power over a person.” The concept of “infernal” is revealed in this way? And why “puppeteer”? Because the person himself is not to blame for what happens to him! And here everyone and many will support me! Psychologists, by the way, are trying to place responsibility on the person himself and his consciousness for what happens to him. This is probably done in order to induce a feeling of guilt and a better opportunity to manipulate such a person for better earnings. But the same thing happened under Stalin! After all, many were repressed! Unfortunately, not all leaders understood the human psyche №116082604761