From the author: Man is fundamentally good. This means that a person's original personality and original intentions towards himself and others are good. The person is fundamentally good. This means that a person's original personality and original intentions towards himself and others are good. When a person finds himself doing too many harmful actions against his dynamics, he becomes his own executioner. When he discovers that he is doing too much evil, he himself, on purpose, unintentionally or unconsciously, restores his ethics, destroying himself, and without outside help drives himself into a coffin. That's why the criminal leaves evidence at the crime scene, and that's why people develop strange, debilitating diseases. Therefore, they decide to get into accidents, which they themselves become the cause of. When they violate their own ethics, they begin to degrade. They do it all themselves, no one else helps them with this. A criminal who leaves behind evidence does so in the hope that someone will come along to stop him from continuing to harm other people. He's basically good. And he doesn't want to harm others. But unable to stop himself completely, he tries to make himself ethical by going to prison, where he will no longer be able to commit crimes. Likewise, a person who weakens himself with illness or has an accident makes himself ethical by reducing his capacity to harm, or perhaps even removing himself completely from the environment he is harming. Even when he has evil intentions, when he deliberately does evil, he still has the desire to stop himself. He tries to suppress these evil intentions, and when he cannot do it directly, he does it in a roundabout way. Evil, disease and degradation often go hand in hand. The person is fundamentally good. His intentions are fundamentally good. He doesn't want to harm himself or others. But if a person still harms his dynamics, he will destroy himself, trying to save these dynamics. When we talk about ethics, we talk about right and wrong. Goodness can be considered a constructive action that promotes survival. It happens that creation is impossible without some minor destruction. Just as in order to build a new apartment building, it is necessary to demolish some old shack. For something to be considered good, it must benefit the person, his family, his children, his group, humanity or life. In order for something to be considered good, it must contain creation that outweighs the destruction contained in it. A new drug that saves a hundred lives and kills one is an acceptable drug. Good is survival. Good is being right more than being wrong. Good is being more successful than unsuccessful in creative activity. Good is what contributes to the survival of a person, his family, children, group, humanity and life. Evil is the antonym of good, and it consists of everything that is more destructive than creative along any of the dynamics. That which brings more destruction than creation is evil from the point of view of the individual, future race, group, humanity or life that is the object of that destruction. When an action brings more destruction than creation, it is evil. It's unethical. When an action contributes more to a person's giving up than to his survival, it is evil insofar as it destroys. In a word, goodness is survival. Ethical behavior is survival. Behavior that brings evil is not survivable. Creation is evil if it interferes with the survival of the individual. Destruction is good if it increases the level of survival. An action or decision is correct to the extent that it contributes to the survival of the individual, the future race of the group,.