I'm not a robot

CAPTCHA

Privacy - Terms

reCAPTCHA v4
Link




















I'm not a robot

CAPTCHA

Privacy - Terms

reCAPTCHA v4
Link



















Open text

Psychologists are increasingly talking about public opinion as something that should not be given importance. And if we are talking about looking at this individual’s opinion, then, of course, our colleagues are right. Moreover, this public opinion about what Imyarek dressed and who he married does not exist at all. Others think about Imyarik for no more than five minutes, and then? Further, each person is much more interesting to himself than to those around him. And while the First is worried about what the Second thinks about him. The Second assumes that the First is thinking about him. So, worrying about what people will say about you is, in fact, energy-unprofitable. But we actually have public opinion as a collective unconscious on a national scale. Well, you must admit that law enforcement agencies do not protect us, officials do not work without bribes, there is no free medicine, education is poor, and everyone steals. Why not public opinion? These are the unshakable destructive attitudes that only slightly differ in the precision of the wording. This is the public opinion that the older generation has nothing special to respect and does not deserve gratitude, there are no authorities, and again everyone in our country is humiliated and that’s it they steal. Meanwhile, public opinion is the only guarantor of the security of any people. If public opinion believes that humiliating a person is wrong, then no one will dare to do this. And if public opinion “by default” agrees - well, everyone steals (here the most obvious example, in my opinion), then this is an official permission to steal. It began with the textbook “rob the loot” and has quite taken root in our society and is taken for granted. “So their salaries are small,” or “Oh, these guys seem to have already stolen, you can vote for them.” Before each such destructive attitude, society threw up its hands and reconciled, “Well, what should we do?” This is public opinion (ours ), that a patient will not be treated for free, he must pay, and a school lesson is evil, but if a private teacher is hired, and the police take advantage of their position for selfish purposes, and... But what to do about it? It probably makes sense to negotiate gradually. Gradually begin to think differently, because we are “they”. The more people can agree and begin to feel that they have the right, the sooner this will transform into public opinion. Isn’t that how it works, colleagues? Doesn’t a person in our country have the right to protect his personality and dignity? It has. So why do we think differently??

posts



67609159
50833743
10377984
36671935
19484987